The government has a settlement with NSCN-I/M at hand. It must sell it to the other Naga groups
By Ajai
Shukla
Business Standard, 30th June 2015
Nagaland
has always been an enigma, shrouded in the cult of the warrior. The 35 Naga
tribes have been fighting since pre-history. From the mid-19th
century, they brought to a standstill British armies seeking to establish
control over Naga areas. Since 1956, they have fought Indian security forces in
the country’s longest running insurgency. And without an outsider to unite
them, the Naga tribes fight amongst themselves.
An hour
from the state capital, Kohima, at the gateway to Khonoma village, is a
memorial slab engraved with 46 names --- residents of just one village who died
fighting the Indian Army. Not far from Khonoma is Nerhema, which celebrates one
of its sons, Captain N Kenguruse of the Indian Army, who won a Mahavir Chakra
--- the country’s second-highest gallantry award --- for successfully assaulting
a Pakistani-held peak, unmindful of his fatal injury.
Given this martial
tradition, it is unsurprising that the guns have not been silent even through
an 18-year ceasefire between the Government of India (GoI) and the most
powerful Naga separatist group, the Isak Swu and Thuingaleng Muivah faction of
the Nationalist Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN-I/M). Though Indian
security forces were off limits, various Naga militant groups sporadically
killed each other in an internecine contest for power and extortion rights.
The
deep-rooted democracy embedded in Naga tribal culture has spawned a succession
of splinter groups, usually along tribal lines. AZ Phizo initiated the fight
for Naga independence, under the banner of the Naga National Council (NNC).
With Phizo exiled to London, NNC leaders in India signed up for peace in the
1975 Shillong Accord. That brought hundreds of insurgents over-ground but a sizeable
group, then training in China, cried sell-out. Led by Isak Swu, Muivah and a
Naga from Myanmar called SS Khaplang, they renamed themselves the NSCN in 1980.
Trained and armed by China and espousing a left-wing ideology, the NSCN saw no
irony in its official slogan: “Nagaland for Christ”.
In 1988 the
NSCN split, with Khaplang, drawing support from northern Nagas like the Konyak
tribe, peeling off from the main group and heading the NSCN-K. Isak Swu and
Muivah now headed the NSCN-I/M, drawing support from southern Nagas, especially
the Manipur-based Tangkhul tribe.
To its
credit, New Delhi has intervened pro-actively in this drama, unlike in Jammu
& Kashmir where it has remained politically passive. In June 1995, Prime
Minister PV Narasimha Rao met NSCN-I/M in Paris. HD Deve Gowda met NSCN-I/M in
Zurich in February 1997, leading directly to a ceasefire agreement in May 1997.
The government appointed a series of “special interlocutors”, who between them
have had some 80 rounds of successful talks with the NSCN-I/M.
Whilst the
NSCN-I/M negotiated as the guest of New Delhi, the NSCN-K stood marginalized,
largely because Muivah made it clear that opening dialogue with Khaplang would mean
the end of talks with him. So Khaplang, a longstanding handmaiden of Indian
intelligence agencies, was told that he would be brought into the dialogue at
the right time. He bided his time.
As a
consequence of dialogue with the NSCN-I/M, New Delhi has in its hands an agreed
settlement with this key group, which the government believes would unlock the
door for separate agreements with other Naga groups and a final end to the
problem. Sources close to the talks say Swu and Muivah have dropped their two
key demands: a sovereign Nagaland with its own constitution, army and currency;
and the integration of all Naga-inhabited areas, including in the neighbouring
states of Manipur, Assam and Arunachal Pradesh.
Making concessions
The sovereignty
demand was dropped when the NSCN-I/M came to the table, an acknowledgment that
maximalist positions had yielded no results in four decades of fighting. The
larger breakthrough was Swu’s and Muivah’s acceptance that it was impossible to
reorganise states to include all Naga-inhabited areas into a “Greater
Nagaland”, termed Nagalim. During negotiations and through years of strife with
the states concerned, the Naga leaders came to understand that Manipur,
Arunachal Pradesh and Assam would on no account accept their territory being peeled
off and merged into Nagalim.
“Even if
the Government of India agreed to expand the boundaries of Nagaland to include
Naga-inhabited areas of neighbouring states, Articles 3 and 4 of the
Constitution of India prescribe that the concerned state legislatures would
have to accede to the proposal. Swu and Muivah understood that, given the neighbouring
states’ opposition, the government does not have the numbers to pass the
amendment through the legislatures involved,” says a source close to the
negotiations.
The
NSCN-I/M, therefore settled for an autonomous administrative mechanism for
Naga-inhabited areas, of the kind already created for other hiill areas, such
as the Ladakh Autonomous Hill Development Councils for Leh and Kargil.
Even so,
the NSCN-I/M is clinging onto hope for a Greater Nagaland some day, perhaps
through the mechanism of a States Reorganization Commission, as was done in the
1950s.
This secret
agreement is reflected in a joint statement by the government and the NSCN-I/M,
issued in New Delhi on July 18, 2011, announcing a breakthrough in the peace
process. It stated: “Sustained negotiations over the past few months have led
to a set of proposals for an honourable political settlement… By appreciating
and respecting each other’s position and difficulties, both the parties are
confident of working out a settlement in the shortest possible time.”
Business
Standard is aware that the settlement was finalised and even checked and
approved for constitutional validity by the Attorney General. Yet two
governments have failed to push it through. For two years in 2012-14, the lame-duck
United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government dallied; followed by a year of
inactivity by the National Democratic Alliance (NDA).
The new
interlocutor, RN Ravi, who is the chairman of the joint intelligence committee,
has met Swu and Muivah. Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited Kohima in November
to inaugurate the Hornbill Festival, but no deal was announced or inked.
Winds of change
Meanwhile,
New Delhi’s negotiation plan --- i.e. to negotiate a settlement with the
NSCN-I/M, which would then catalyse settlements with the NSCN-K, the NNC and
various splinter factions --- began to unravel, setting the stage for the bloody
June 4 ambush on an army column in Manipur, in which 18 soldiers died. Khaplang
ran out of patience and trust, concluding that New Delhi’s deal with Swu and
Muivah would leave him out in the cold. With a limited support base in India,
this Burmese Naga would have to feed off the crumbs from Muivah’s table. With
time running out, Khaplang refused to renew his ceasefire in April.
The signals
were clear that Khaplang would strike hard at Indian security forces to
underline his relevance. Even as the NSCN-K began splintering --- a new group,
NSNC-R peeled off days after the ceasefire abrogation --- Khaplang’s fighters
began targeting the security forces. On April 25th, an Assam Rifles trooper was
shot dead; on May 3, the NSCN-K killed eight security personnel and wounded
nine in Mon district.
Yet the
government in New Delhi did little. Minister of State for Home Affairs, Kiren
Rijuju blandly declared that the government took “serious note of the incident
from the security point of view”.
“The June 4
attack was an explosion waiting to happen. We should have activated
intelligence sources, tightened up security forces and issued public statements
to tell Nagas that Khaplang had repudiated the ceasefire, which the government
wanted to continue. Public sentiment in Nagaland overwhelmingly favours an end
to violence. The government could have generated strong public pressure on
Khaplang to return to the table”, says a senior Nagaland government official.
Intelligence
officials admit they underestimated Khaplang, who had already joined hands with
nine northeast militant groups, forming a joint front, United National
Liberation Front of West South East Asia (UNLFWSEA).
Even so,
the Indian Army’s cross-border strike of June 9 against Khaplang’s camps in
Myanmar has put the spotlight on both NSCN-K and the government. Khaplang’s
fighters, accustomed to the comfort of ceasefire camps, do not relish the prospect
of a return to jungle camps with the army at their heels. For the government,
there is the need to sign off on an agreement that satisfies not just the
NSCN-K, but also an angry and embittered Khaplang.